Or: The uncomfortable question of what freedom really costs.
We’re sitting in Berlin, under the dome of debates about data, cloud computing, and European infrastructures. Silicon Valley, yes. Dependencies, sure. But meanwhile—and this is the crucial point—we’re losing control over what really matters: our minds and more. Our own. The question isn’t new, but it has become urgent. Can we truly be digitally sovereign when we’re already psychologically controlled by others?
What exactly is sovereignty?
The word comes from the Latin superanus — one who is “above” or “above,” one who is not controlled from the outside. Simple and banal, really.
But: That’s not us.
We’re navigating an invisible labyrinth. Algorithms that know what we want before we do. Feeds that stalk our attention like predatory animals. Opinions that feel like our own, but come from somewhere else. Fears we didn’t create. Affiliations that cost more than they give.
Michel Foucault already saw this in the 70s—these subliminal power mechanisms that no longer shout, but whisper. People dance and believe it’s their music. But someone else has already handed out the headphones.
Today, this person has a name: algorithm.
“It is not a sign of health to perfectly adapt to a sick society.” — Jiddu Krishnamurti
Full stop. Perhaps this is the real crux of the whole story.
The new invasion — and it’s happening in your head
Okay, Europe is right: We are dependent. On Google, Meta, on Amazon—this is not a conspiracy theory. Data monopolies, economic dependencies, influence on elections, on debates, even on what we call “normal.” The risks are real and not paranoia.
But the interesting thing is: the greatest colonization isn’t happening in the data center. It’s happening inside you. In your consciousness.
In the 21st century, your attention is the currency. Not oil. Not lithium. Your time. Your focus. Your awareness—these are the valuable resources.
Neurobiologist Gerald Hüther puts it clearly: A brain that is constantly bombarded becomes flat. Reactive. It twitches at every stimulus and immediately jumps to the next.
Yoga traditions have recognized this state for millennia. They call it Vikṣepa—the scattering of the mind. In Vedanta, there is a name for the force that keeps you trapped in this confusion: Māyā. The force of delusion. That force which tears your consciousness apart in a thousand directions.
What appears to be a tech-policy problem is in reality a spiritual crisis.
Digital sovereignty doesn’t begin in the data center.
The re:publica conference discusses (and is meant to discuss) European platforms, open source, decentralized networks, and data that doesn’t end up in the US. Important, of course.
However, a person can work on the freest Linux system in the world and still be a prisoner.
Unfreedom arises where your thinking is on autopilot, where you adopt opinions that are not your own, where your identity is only the group you belong to, where fear filters your perception.
The Roman Stoic Seneca understood this. “He who controls himself is truly free,” he said. This statement seems provocative today. Yet it is simply true.
The networked human — between opportunity and control
The thing is: these platforms are literally built to hack you. Reward loops. Your dopamine is the currency. Social validation as a drug. FOMO—the fear of missing out. Outrage as fuel. Your tribal affiliation as a product to be sold to other machines.
The crazy thing is: you have access to more information than any human being before. And at the same time, fewer and fewer people are thinking for themselves.
C.G. Jung warned that if you become completely absorbed in mass movements, you lose your individuality. The shadow—that which you don’t see, which you don’t want to admit—grows in proportion.
Today, the labyrinth looks like this: echo chambers that cement you in your beliefs. Moral self-promotion instead of genuine reflection. Algorithms that profit from your anger. Artificial identities you construct online while the real person sits at home in silent confusion.
Man will not become a thinker. He will become a data set.
Never Gonna Give You Up — A different reading
The motto of re:publica 2026 is actually quite clever.
“Never Gonna Give You Up.”
It sounds like Rick Astley at first. But what if it means something completely different?
Don’t surrender your judgment. Don’t abandon your inner center just because the crowd applauds. Don’t surrender your free thinking to platforms. Don’t surrender your soul to architectures of attention.
The Indian mystic Sri Aurobindo put it this way: “Man is a being in the process of becoming.” The only question is: Where is he becoming? A human being who thinks—or a machine that simulates thinking?
Sovereignty is not a technology — it is a practice.
Perhaps we don’t just need new technology. Perhaps we need a new culture of self-determination. One that teaches us how to think consciously—without noise. How to endure silence—without fear. How to live with contradiction—without falling into tribalism. How to see manipulation before it has you. How to protect our attention like a precious treasure.
That sounds like meditation. Like philosophy. Like the “esoteric” fringes. But perhaps it’s the other way around: These are the democratic skills of the future.
Socrates’ ancient saying — “Know thyself” — seems like a guide against digital manipulation today. It is the true antidote to total control.
Europe between freedom and the dream of control
Of course, digital infrastructure needs rules. Of course, democracy needs protection from manipulation. Nobody wants a dictatorship 2.0—just with better UX.
But this is where the real tension arises: When does protection become paternalism? When does regulation become subtle control? When does the state become a surveillance state, because it only wants to “protect you”?
History teaches us that it’s not just corporations that crave control. Governments, institutions, and political systems do too. They all share this impulse to steer people “for their own good.”
Centralized digital IDs. Algorithmic surveillance. AI regulation that ultimately only allows approved thoughts. All of this can protect freedom. Or it can limit your freedom so slowly, so imperceptibly, that no one notices until it’s too late.
The real question, therefore, is not: “Who controls the technology?”
The question is: “How do I remain inwardly free — regardless of who holds the machines?”
The other digital revolution
Perhaps real change will only begin when people relearn: to think independently—not reflexively; to perceive consciously—not on autopilot; to reclaim their attention—from the system; to recognize psychological dependencies—before they completely control you.
European server farms without internal freedom are only a half solution.
True sovereignty cannot be found on a map.
It is a state of consciousness.
And perhaps this is the unspoken question vibrating beneath re:publica 2026: How do we remain human — in the age of algorithms? How do we preserve what makes us who we are — the ability to think, to feel, to choose — when the infrastructure around us rewards the exact opposite?
There is no simple answer. But asking the question—that is already the first act of freedom.
Joachim Nusch · Sovereign Vedic Mentor · Consciousness Researcher
re:publica 2026
To the podcast :